What you really do with OODA loops

by jonathan on June 30, 2009

These are some selections and notes from a brilliant essay by Dr Chester W Richards about OODA loops and the general application of military know how to business. From “What you really do with OODA loops” :

The key to the military notion of time lies in how practitioners of the art of war view strategy. Great commanders down through the years have used time-based strategy to cloud their opponents’ understanding and destroy their morale so that the battle, if it must be fought at all, is relatively quick and painless. In the language of conflict, we say that they move their opponents where they want them to be. Leaders in business and industry can do the same thing and with similar results. This paper explores this notion, first by looking at what today’s most avant-garde business theorists claim for the concept of time, and then comparing that to what the most successful generals and strategists aim to achieve. Finally, we will the translate the military goals and objectives back into the commercial world and look for examples where it actually worked.

…Building one new business after another, faster than the competition, is the only way to stay ahead.

a real strategist doesn’t like words like “respond” and is dubious about “anticipate.” These are passive sorts of things…

Now it is true that fast reactions have their place – if your opponent catches you by surprise, for example. Competence in this tactic, such things as staying cool, using the other side’s momentum against them, and so on, form an essential part of any competitor’s tool kit. Problems arise when, as in the above paradigm, reaction becomes the goal of strategy. First, under such an arrangement, if we don’t see anything, we don’t do anything. So much for initiative.

[click to continue…]

If you like it, share it...:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • co.mments
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

{ 0 comments }

Elliot Jaques and Requisite Organisation

by jonathan on June 15, 2009

From the Economist’s Guru section article on Elliott Jaques:

Jaques (1917-2003) decided that jobs could be defined in terms of their time horizon. For example, a director of marketing might be worried about marketing campaigns for next year, while a salesman on the road is worried about reaching his targets for the week. Jaques also believed that people had a “boss” and a “real boss”. The boss was the person to whom they were nominally responsible, while the real boss was the person to whom they turned to get decisions crucial to the continuation of their work.

The sales manager in charge of a salesforce would not have a longer time horizon than the people in his salesforce. So when a salesman wanted a decision on something affecting his ability to deliver to his clients, he would go over the head of the sales manager for that decision. Jaques called this “level skipping”, and identified it as a dangerous pathology in any hierarchy.

He then looked at the time horizons of people, their bosses and their real bosses, and he found that people with a time horizon of less than three months treated those with a horizon of 3–12 months as their real bosses, and so on up the scale. He identified seven different time horizons, from three months to 20 years, and argued that organisations, no matter how complex, should have seven levels of hierarchy, each corresponding to a different managerial time horizon. Jaques’s theory has come to be known as RO (requisite organisation).

This reminds me of the Tolstoy quotation from C.S. Lewis’s “The Inner Ring”:

“When Boris entered the room, Prince Andrey was listening to an old general, wearing his decorations, who was reporting something to Prince Andrey, with an expression of soldierly servility on his purple face. “Alright. Please wait!” he said to the general, speaking in Russian with the French accent, which he used when he spoke with contempt. The moment he noticed Boris he stopped listening to the general who trotted imploringly after him and begged to be heard, while Prince Andrey turned to Boris with a cheerful smile and a nod of the head. Boris now clearly understood-what he had already guessed-that side by side with the system of discipline and subordination which were laid down in the Army Regulations, there existed a different and a more real system-the system which compelled a tightly laced general with a purple face to wait respectfully for his turn while a mere captain like Prince Andrey chatted with a mere second lieutenant like Boris, Boris decided at once that he would be guided not by the official system but by this other unwritten system.”

If you like it, share it...:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • co.mments
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati

{ 0 comments }

Some great book combinations

June 12, 2009

Here are a few books that compliment each other wonderfully:
“Getting Things Done” and “Getting It Done”

“McMafia” and “Illicit”

“Nudge” and “Influencer” and “Yes”

If you like it, share it…:

If you like it, share it...:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • co.mments
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Read the full article →

Bookmarks for May 28th 2009 through June 11th 2009

June 11, 2009

These are my links for May 28th 2009 through June 11th 2009:

The dark side of Dubai – The Independent – Dubai was meant to be a Middle-Eastern Shangri-La, a glittering monument to Arab enterprise and western capitalism. But as hard times arrive in the city state that rose from the desert sands, an uglier [...]

If you like it, share it...:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • co.mments
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Read the full article →

Brilliant summary of best persuasion tips

May 31, 2009

[Originally published at Limbicnutrition.com]

Alex Moskalyuk has distilled the entirely of the book “Yes!: 50 Scientifically Proven Ways to Be Persuasive” by Cialdini et al into a single blog post.
It really does get in the best of them, including tips I recognise from recent the persuasion best-seller “Nudge” by  Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein.
Read [...]

If you like it, share it...:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • co.mments
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Read the full article →

Rules of Thumb

May 31, 2009

Steve Roesler of All Things Workplace, one of the most dependable book recommenders I know of, gives “Rules of Thumb” a rave review in a recent post on his blog.
The subtitle lives up to its words: “52 Truths For Winning At Business Without Losing Your Self”.You
don’t see many book reviews here even though we [...]

If you like it, share it...:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • co.mments
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Read the full article →

Agile, By Any Other Name…

May 30, 2009

Projects@Work have an excellent introduction to Agile Project Management: Agile, By Any Other Name…
Agile, by any other name, would still look like modern project management. The value-driven benefits of scrums, stories and showcases have made sense well before the emergence of Agile. And they certainly aren’t incompatible with so-called “traditional” project management concepts and techniques.

What [...]

If you like it, share it...:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • co.mments
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Read the full article →

Managing Stakeholders – The Myth and the Reality

May 30, 2009

A good article Gannthead.com tackles the myth of the stakeholder.
Managing Stakeholders: The Myth and the Reality
Imagine the perfect project:
The organization faces a key challenge. Stakeholders quickly rally to the cause. Consultations are held, requirements are defined and all involved find constructive ways to compromise, balancing their needs with those of the larger organization. A fully [...]

If you like it, share it...:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • co.mments
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Read the full article →

Doc Searls on Business

May 26, 2009

“Business is a place where we are socially productive with each other.”
Doc Sears, IT Conversations on Emerging Communications.
IT Conversations | Emerging Communications | Doc Searls Free Podcast

If you like it, share it…:

If you like it, share it...:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • co.mments
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Read the full article →

Bookmarks for April 13th 2009 through May 14th 2009

May 14, 2009

These are my links for April 13th 2009 through May 14th 2009:

Annals of Innovation: How David Beats Goliath: Reporting & Essays: The New Yorker – David’s victory over Goliath, in the Biblical account, is held to be an anomaly. It was not. Davids win all the time. The political scientist Ivan Arreguín-Toft recently looked at [...]

If you like it, share it...:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • co.mments
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Read the full article →